Yield Monitor: Current APY Across Tokenized Fund Products
BlackRock’s BUIDL leads tokenized treasury yields at 3.45% APY, while Maple Finance’s syrupUSDC tops the broader market at 4.89% with credit-enhanced returns. This dashboard tracks current yields across all major tokenized fund products — yields reported as trailing annualized percentage yield (APY) net of management fees. Data sourced from issuer disclosures, on-chain analytics, and RWA.xyz.
Understanding yield differences across tokenized fund products requires recognizing that yield is a function of three factors: the underlying asset yield (primarily the US Treasury risk-free rate), the total expense ratio (platform fees, compliance costs, operational overhead), and risk premium (credit risk, smart contract risk, liquidity risk for non-treasury products). The fee analysis decomposes costs, and the risk metrics quantify risk factors.
Current Yields: Treasury Products
| Rank | Product | APY | Issuer | AUM | Token Model | Risk Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | USYC | 3.13% | Circle/Hashnote | $2.40B | Accumulating NAV | Low |
| 2 | BUIDL | 3.45% | BlackRock | $2.01B | Rebase | Lowest |
| 3 | USDY | 3.55% | Ondo | $1.21B | Accumulating NAV | Low-Medium |
| 4 | BENJI | 3.51% | Franklin Templeton | $1.01B | Rebase | Lowest |
| 5 | WTGXX | 3.49% | WisdomTree | $742.8M | Rebase | Lowest |
| 6 | OUSG | ~3.75% | Ondo | $721.4M | Accumulating NAV | Low |
| 7 | USTB | 3.50% | Superstate | $666.8M | Accumulating NAV | Lowest |
| 8 | ChinaAMC CUMIU | 3.77% | ChinaAMC | $546.1M | - | Low |
Treasury product yields cluster between 3.13% and 3.77%, reflecting the current risk-free rate (Fed Funds at 4.33%) minus total expense ratios of varying basis points. BUIDL has distributed over $100M in total dividends since inception ($4M-$8M monthly). BENJI has distributed $51M+ in total dividends. The yield spread within the treasury category is primarily driven by fee differences — BENJI’s lower yield reflects higher compliance costs from SEC registration, while BUIDL’s higher yield reflects the BVI structure’s lower regulatory overhead. The BUIDL vs BENJI comparison analyzes the yield gap.
Current Yields: Enhanced Yield Products
| Product | APY | Issuer | AUM | Yield Source | Risk Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| syrupUSDC | 4.89% | Maple | $1.75B | Institutional lending | Medium-High |
| USDY | 3.55% | Ondo | $1.21B | T-bills + bank deposits | Low-Medium |
| Credit tokens | 4-8%+ | Various | Various | Protocol lending | High |
Enhanced yield products provide returns above the risk-free rate by accepting credit risk. The treasury funds vs yield products comparison analyzes the risk-return trade-offs across categories.
Federal Funds Rate Relationship
Current Fed Funds Rate: 4.33%
Tokenized treasury product yields track the Federal Funds Rate with a lag determined by portfolio duration and rebalancing frequency. The relationship works as follows:
- Fed Funds Rate sets the base for overnight repo rates and short-term T-bill yields
- Tokenized treasury funds invest in these short-duration instruments
- Net yield to investors equals gross portfolio yield minus total expense ratio
- Implied total expense ratios: BUIDL ~87 bps, USYC ~93 bps, OUSG ~98 bps, BENJI ~132 bps, USTB ~133 bps
When the Fed cuts rates, tokenized treasury yields decline with a 1-4 week lag as the underlying portfolio rolls into lower-yielding instruments. When the Fed raises rates, yields increase with a similar lag. The yield mechanics analysis provides detailed Fed rate sensitivity modeling.
Rate Path Implications: If the Fed continues cutting rates (current market expectation), tokenized treasury yields will decline proportionally. At a hypothetical Fed Funds Rate of 3.50%, BUIDL might yield approximately 2.63%, and BENJI approximately 2.18%. Investors should model yield sensitivity to rate scenarios when sizing tokenized treasury allocations. The yield curve analysis provides rate scenario modeling.
Yield Comparison: Tokenized vs Traditional
Tokenized treasury products trail traditional money market funds by 75-125 basis points:
| Product | APY | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Vanguard VMFXX | 4.24% | Traditional MMF |
| Fidelity SPAXX | 4.19% | Traditional MMF |
| Schwab SWVXX | 4.18% | Traditional MMF |
| BUIDL | 3.45% | Tokenized |
| BENJI | 3.51% | Tokenized |
This gap represents the current cost of tokenized fund infrastructure — platform fees, blockchain operational costs, and compliance overhead. The gap should narrow as tokenized funds scale. The tokenized vs traditional comparison provides comprehensive analysis.
Yield Optimization Strategies
For investors seeking to maximize risk-adjusted yield across tokenized fund products:
Strategy 1 — OUSG Leverage via Flux Finance: Deposit OUSG as collateral on Flux Finance, borrow USDC, convert to more OUSG. At 2x leverage with ~2.25% borrow cost, effective yield reaches approximately 4.5-4.7% on US Treasury exposure. This exceeds traditional MMF yields while maintaining government credit quality. The yield optimization guide details this strategy.
Strategy 2 — Treasury/Yield Barbell: Allocate 60-70% to treasury products (BUIDL or USYC) for capital preservation, and 30-40% to syrupUSDC for yield enhancement. Blended yield: approximately 3.9-4.1%. This approach captures credit premium while limiting downside through treasury diversification.
Strategy 3 — Multi-Product Diversification: Spread allocation across multiple products to reduce single-product risk: BUIDL + USYC + OUSG + USDY. Blended yield: approximately 3.4-3.5% with diversified counterparty and platform risk.
The yield strategy guide provides comprehensive portfolio construction frameworks, and the risk metrics score each strategy’s risk profile.
Monitoring Methodology
Yields are monitored through on-chain data analysis (tracking rebase distributions for BUIDL and BENJI, NAV price changes for accumulating products), issuer-published yield data (fund fact sheets, product dashboards, press releases), third-party aggregators (RWA.xyz, DeFiLlama, Token Terminal), and Federal Reserve data (Fed Funds Rate, Treasury yield curve, repo rates).
Yield data updates daily for most products. Users should verify current yields against issuer-published data, as this dashboard reflects the most recent available data at the time of publication. Rebase product yields (BUIDL, BENJI) are derived from the daily token distribution rate annualized. Accumulating NAV product yields (OUSG, USDY, USYC) are derived from 30-day rolling NAV price changes annualized. Lending product yields (syrupUSDC) are derived from pool-reported net APY after protocol fees. All yields are net of management fees unless otherwise stated. The methodology page describes the full yield calculation and verification process.
For market-wide TVL data, see the TVL tracker. For holder growth data, see the holder growth tracker. For product-level deep dives, see the fund comparison matrix. For the broader competitive landscape, see the entity profiles and comparison series.